With this simple value stream to produce products A and B we want to illustrate the way to maximize profit taking into account the system constraints.

·         Each product is made by assembling two subassemblies, one of them common to both products.

·         We have three special purpose workstations with a corresponding operator trained for the specific job.

·         The line operates one shift with 2400 productive minutes per week.

·         The fixed costs, which include the salaries of the three operators, are 8000 € per week.

·         Product A is sold for 90€ and B for 100€.

·         The maximum weekly market demand is 200 units for A and 100 for B

·         Total direct costs (materials) for product A is 50€ and for B 40€ as shown above.

·         We want to know how many products A and how many B we should produce to maximize profit.

 First of all let’s look at the system constraints:

  • Time available per week for each of the three operators is 2400 minutes
  • Weekly market constraints: 200 A and 100 B.

 

We want to maximize overall profit so we calculate the margin of each product:

Since we can’t satisfy all the market demand we must decide which product should be our priority. If we ask Finance they will tell us B is the best, since it has the highest margin.

 Let’s see how many resources we will need to produce all the market demand for B and how many A’s we will be able to produce with the remaining resources:

With the remaining manufacturing capacity we would be able to produce 140 A’s and assemble 380 A’s but we can only test 40 A’s.  It makes no sense to manufacture more A’s than we can test. The excess assembly capacity will be wasted because we can only assemble the units which have been tested. This means that in fact we will only be able to produce 100 B’s and 40 A’s. This gives us a total loss per week of 400€.

Maybe the Finance criteria of giving priority to the product with the highest margin was not so good after all.

We have already noticed that the bottleneck in this line is Test: it is limiting the effective capacity of the whole line.

The use of bottleneck time is therefore a critical factor we should consider in optimizing the line. 

We need to ask ourselves how much bottleneck time is consumed to obtain a 40€ margin in product A, and the same for B. 

This means that each minute of test time (bottleneck) if used to test product A gives us a margin of 4€ while B only gives us 3€.

 So when we take into consideration the existing constraints A is more profitable. Let’s give priority to A and use the remaining capacity to produce B:

So the bottleneck plays an important role in finding the optimal solution: it defines the effective capacity of the whole line, therefore we need to optimize the use of bottleneck time.

 We can clearly see that due to the existing constraints this line is very inefficient. Let’s look at the capacity utilization of each operation:

The only operation with 100% utilization is test. This is what we would expect since it is the bottleneck. We see that final assembly has very low utilization (less than 50%).

We can see that the only way to improve further the productivity is to reduce test time by making it more efficient or to transfer some work (if possible) to the assembly operation.

 

Graphical Solution

 Let’s now look at the problem graphically:

The red area is the forbidden area due to the constraints: maximum A, maximum B and the constraint of the 2400 minutes available at the bottleneck (test): each A consumes 10 minutes of test and each B 20 minutes. 

We now look at the point of maximum profit: It will be the furthest point from the origin within the allowed area (green) which is the point of maximum A (200 units) and 20 units of B.

 

Solution with Solver

 Now let’s see how to solve the problem with Microsoft Excel Solver. First we need to set all the data in a spread sheet:

Download file: Solver1.xlsx

In matrix B3:D4 we have the unit times for each operation in products A and B.

Column E has material costs and F product selling price. In column G (margin) we need a formula which just subtracts F – E.

In column H (Produced) we want Solver to place the results we are looking for: number of A’s and B’s to produce. 

Column I has the market constraints for A and B.

Row 5 has the formulas above to calculate time consumed on each operation based on the products produced. These values we will compare with row 6 (available times for each operation)

Finally B10 has the shown formula to calculate the profit. This is the cell we will ask Solver to maximize. 

Now we go to Solver to setup the parameters as shown:

We want Profit (B10) to maximize changing cells H3:H4 where Solver will place the solution we are looking for.

Now the constraints:

  •  B5:D5 B6:D6    Used times Available times
  •  H3:H4 I3:I4      Don’t produce above market demand
  •  H3:H4    Must be integers and not negative

 Press resolve and we will get the results:

 

Process Improvement

Now imagine that an engineer has found a way to reduce test time of product A from a total of 10 minutes to 9 minutes by adding some work to the assembly operation which would involve an increase from the previous time of 5 minutes to 7.

This suggestion would be difficult to justify with Finance, since we are increasing the overall operator time of product A one minute.

 But let us look at our Excel to see what Solver has to say:

We have been able to produce 10 more B’s increasing the profit from 1200€ to 1800€.

This is telling us that maybe the way we compute product profit may not help when we have idle time in some of the operations.

 

Container distribution example

Now let’s see another example of Theory of Constraints solution with Solver:

 In this case we want to minimize the cost of distribution of goods containers from warehouses X, Y, Z  to shops A, B, C, D, E, F:

Download file: Solver2.xlsx

Matrix C4:H6 contains the transport costs of one container from each warehouse to each shop.

Matrix C9:H11 will contain the number of containers from each warehouse to each shop we are looking for.

The blue cells have the formulas shown.

 The Solver parameters will be:

Notice we must meet all the shops requirements:  C12:H12 = C13:H13

 And the resulting solution:

This is the optimal solution which meets all the constraints.

 

Conclusion

  • All Value Streams are subject to multiple constraints such as:
    • Time
    • Cost
    •  Delivery
    •  Workforce 
    •  Market demand
  • The optimal operating point very much depends on the existing constraints which may vary along time.
  • Microsoft Excel Solver is useful to optimize a Value Stream which is subject to multiple constraints.